performance problems (RPS vs. VPS)

bjo

Joined: 2007-02-13
Posts: 5
Posted: Sun, 2008-05-18 05:22

Hello,

I ran Gallery2 (see below for more details) several years on a VPS (AMD64 DualCore, 384MB RAM, 4GB Swap (unkown how much the VPS can use). It's a multisite-installation with 4 sites.

Some weeks ago I moved to a RPS (a dedicated server with an iSCSI-disk running on a SAN): Celeron 1,2 GHz, 512 MB RAM, 512MB Swap on a USB-Stick).

The smaller G2-sites (between 90 und 300 pics) run fine, but mine (720 pics) is just slow. Sometimes it takes about 2-3min to get an album loaded. My gallery has 5 albums, with some subalbums und in some cases subsubalbums.

Gallery-Version = 2.2.3 Kern 1.2.0.5
PHP-Version = 5.2.5-3 apache2handler
Webserver = Apache
Datenbank = mysql 5.0.51a-5-log, lock.system=flock
Werkzeuge = ArchiveUpload, Exif, ImageMagick, Gd
Beschleunigung = none/86400, none/86400
Betriebssystem = Linux soleil.nord-west.net 2.6.24.5-grsec-xxxx-grs-ipv4-32 #2 SMP Tue May 6 08:08:22 CEST 2008 i686
Standard-Motiv = PGtheme
gettext = Aktiviert
Sprache = de_DE
Browser = Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080419 Ubuntu/8.04 (hardy) Firefox/2.0.0.14
Zeilen in der GalleryAccessMap Tabelle = 144
Zeilen in der GalleryAccessSubscriberMap Tabelle = 724
Zeilen in der GalleryUser Tabelle = 2
Zeilen in der GalleryItem Tabelle = 723
Zeilen in der GalleryAlbumItem Tabelle = 29
Zeilen in der GalleryCacheMap Tabelle = 0

Any suggestions except "get a better server"?
Login or register to post comments
bjo

Joined: 2007-02-13
Posts: 5
Posted: Sun, 2008-05-18 15:46

Addition:

After some testing I found out: The 300pics-gallery on the RPS loads faster than the 720pics-gallery on a dedicated server with a normal harddrive. Strange.
Login or register to post comments