[Map Module] Which version do you use ?
|
Termitenshort
Joined: 2005-10-09
Posts: 1894 |
Posted: Tue, 2006-02-28 13:22
|
|
I would like to know which version everyone uses if possible. I'm trying to figure out if I should continue dev. on the gallery 2.0 version of if it should be strickly limited to bug fixes and maybe only dev the newer version for gallery 2.1 I have to say it's hard to keep track of 2 version of the same module ------------------------- |
|
Posts: 1023
I've switched already fully to 2.1
CU
Lutz
Gallery version = 2.1-rc-1b core 1.0.30
PHP version=5.1.2 apache2handler
Webserver=Apache/2.2.0 (Win32) DAV/2 PHP/5.1.1 mod_ssl/2.2.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8a
Database=mysql 5.0.18-nt-log
Gallery-URL=http://lf-photodesign.de
Posts: 27300
Gallery 2.0 For production sites and only upgrade to final releases (skipping RCs) after the first month. But saying that I am happy with the map module. So my vote is to dev on G2.1 and bug fix the module for G2.0.
Dave
____________________________________________________
Gallery Frames / Mods || G1 Test Gallery
Posts: 1894
Oh and I forgot.
My production machine runs on 0.4.10c for now with gallery 2.0.2
The Map Module Team gallery runs the latest CVS with map module 0.5.0c
See you !
-------------------------
The Termite
Posts: 164
0.5.0c for me.
regards,
patrick
Gallery version = 2.1-rc-1a core 1.0.28
PHP version = 4.3.9 apache2handler
Webserver = Apache/2.0.52 (Red Hat)
Database = postgres7
Toolkits = Exif, ArchiveUpload, Dcraw, Ffmpeg, ImageMagick, NetPBM, Gd
Operating system = Linux 2.6.9-11.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri May 20 18:25:30 EDT 2005 x86_64
Browser = Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1
http://www.idyll.com/gallery2
Posts: 364
My vote is for all development to be channeled into 0.5 and
0.4 to have -only- severe/critical problems addressed. That
will simplify things and allow for R&D of 0.5 on Gallery 2.1
and API-V2.
Posts: 1894
Ok then .. that sets it unless someone doesn't agree later
That's what I was thinking since there was 80 d/l of map-module-0.5.0c.zip compared to only 20 for map-module-0.4.0c.zip (even tho the later is a lot less buggy).
So I will be concentrating my effort on dev for Gallery 2.1 from now on and will publish a new version of the map module v 0.5.0 soon to correct all(or as many as possible) bugs found to date.
See you all !
-------------------------
The Termite
Posts: 52
Yeah
I also use 2.1 and I am really looking forward to the bug fixes 
Posts: 1023
yippiii
;)
Gallery version = 2.1-rc-1b core 1.0.30
PHP version=5.1.2 apache2handler
Webserver=Apache/2.2.0 (Win32) DAV/2 PHP/5.1.1 mod_ssl/2.2.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8a
Database=mysql 5.0.18-nt-log
Gallery-URL=http://lf-photodesign.de
Posts: 224
my vote is for 2.1 as well
Posts: 108
Agree. Currently 2.0.2/0.4.10c
Moz
Posts: 107
Agreed. 2.0 should get bugs fixed and development could then move fully to 2.1.
With any luck any fix for 2.0 can be transferred to the 2.1 base anyway.
Eduo
---
www.eduo.info
www.eduo.info/gallery/
www.hamsterspit.com
Posts: 1894
Yes but that takes a lot of my time and it's basically doing the work twice (even if the second time is copy/paste)...
I'd like to focus on dev for 1 version to prevent mistakes also. Let me tell you that it's pretty confusing to manage 2 version of the same program
0.5.0 will now get all the focus after I'm done fixing the current bugs
See you !