How many pictures do you have in YOUR gallery?
|
pkx
Joined: 2003-01-27
Posts: 54 |
Posted: Thu, 2003-07-10 01:25
|
|
My gallery page builds pretty slow... I have over 8000 of them. Every picture I've taken with the 9 digital cameras I've owned since August 1997. Will G2 be faster? Just curious My picture gallery: |
|
|
hdotnet
Joined: 2003-01-29
Posts: 23 |
Posted: Thu, 2003-07-10 17:13
|
|
....be anything. i have one server with 5k+ smaller images (640x480) on a not very shared server that works fine. i also have gallery running on a private dedicated server, using my hi-res piks (1mb and up). about 1500 of them. that runs slow, but so does photoshop when playing with 20 odd 1 meg images at a time. its also a crap server. |
|
|
diomark
Joined: 2003-03-14
Posts: 90 |
Posted: Sat, 2003-07-12 05:16
|
|
5300+ images on http://mvgals.net - most highrez.. Running off a laptop over my dsl |
|
|
bharat
Joined: 2002-05-21
Posts: 7994 |
Posted: Sat, 2003-07-12 07:02
|
|
G2 is way faster for large galleries. I've tested it with 100,000 photos and had reasonable (1-2 second) page loads. I haven't yet done any optimizing so I expect that performance will increase when I find time to do an optimization pass. |
|
|
loxly
Joined: 2003-01-28
Posts: 126 |
Posted: Sat, 2003-07-26 06:32
|
|
Way cool, guess I better download a daily build and give it a test drive!!!! I'm building a gallery now that will have 5000-10000 images. Any difference between netpbm and Image Magick for speed? |
|
|
alindeman
Joined: 2002-10-06
Posts: 8194 |
Posted: Sat, 2003-07-26 13:41
|
|
I find ImageMagick to be noticably faster... |
|
|
dochogan
Joined: 2003-12-19
Posts: 38 |
Posted: Mon, 2003-12-22 19:01
|
|
I had around 300 personal pics up until a couple hours ago, when I accidentally deleted the wrong album.... Now I have 10 pics Backups, riiiiiiight ;)
|
|
|
Roo
Joined: 2003-07-16
Posts: 88 |
Posted: Tue, 2003-12-23 05:00
|
|
At the moment I have 559. |
|
|
h0bbel
Joined: 2002-07-28
Posts: 13451 |
Posted: Tue, 2003-12-23 08:13
|
|
11 top-level albums (89 total), 2276 images |
|
|
8miles
Joined: 2003-04-02
Posts: 24 |
Posted: Wed, 2003-12-24 07:50
|
|
at this moment ...... 32500 albums, 458000 photos ..... |
|
|
h0bbel
Joined: 2002-07-28
Posts: 13451 |
Posted: Wed, 2003-12-24 12:12
|
|
8miles, and this is running on which hardware? |
|
|
alindeman
Joined: 2002-10-06
Posts: 8194 |
Posted: Wed, 2003-12-24 14:25
|
|
Holy ! You'll especially like G2 then.. |
|
|
8miles
Joined: 2003-04-02
Posts: 24 |
Posted: Thu, 2003-12-25 09:07
|
|
It was running with a Celeron 2.4GHz and 1GB Ram ..... Now receiving around 300,000 - 400,000 page view per day. My site is based on heavily modified Gallery 1.3, so performance is not related to number of albums/photos I believe. My site is http://www.fotop.net, please feel free to take a look at it. |
|
|
nukestud
Joined: 2003-03-25
Posts: 114 |
Posted: Mon, 2003-12-29 12:58
|
|
8miles, what performance tweaks did you do to make 1.3 run so well. I only have around a few hundred albums and 25 000 pics and it runs like a dog Cheers |
|
|
SamBeckett
Joined: 2002-09-29
Posts: 146 |
Posted: Tue, 2003-12-30 18:19
|
|
one with 6500 images, one with 4500, and another with 511 |
|
|
nukestud
Joined: 2003-03-25
Posts: 114 |
Posted: Tue, 2003-12-30 18:25
|
|
SamBeckett wrote:
one with 6500 images, one with 4500, and another with 511 You mean 3 installs? |
|
|
8miles
Joined: 2003-04-02
Posts: 24 |
Posted: Fri, 2004-01-02 15:26
|
|
nukestud wrote:
8miles, what performance tweaks did you do to make 1.3 run so well. I only have around a few hundred albums and 25 000 pics and it runs like a dog SQLized it! Also, if you want performance, don't upgrade an to 1.4! It's even slower! |
|
|
italjet
Joined: 2003-03-12
Posts: 12 |
Posted: Sat, 2004-01-10 00:34
|
|
Huh????? Sorry but... come again? U SQLized it? How? Gimme gimme gimme! Luka :oops: |
|
|
8miles
Joined: 2003-04-02
Posts: 24 |
Posted: Sat, 2004-01-10 03:54
|
|
Don't you find that some operations such as "move album / photo" is damn slow? Also, calling to album.php consumer huge amount of RAM? Is your "hits" means "pageviews", or http connect at your access_log? |
|
|
alindeman
Joined: 2002-10-06
Posts: 8194 |
Posted: Sat, 2004-01-10 04:07
|
|
If you ported Gallery 1.x to SQL, you definately wasted your time. That's one of the main reasons we are writing G2, not to mention that would be a LARGE pain to write G1 to use SQL. |
|
|
italjet
Joined: 2003-03-12
Posts: 12 |
Posted: Sat, 2004-01-10 12:11
|
|
8miles wrote:
Don't you find that some operations such as "move album / photo" is damn slow? Also, calling to album.php consumer huge amount of RAM? Yeah some operations get slow. I'm no php guru, so I think the best way to describe the problem is to say that it reads all albums that are stored in your gallery before it can move. That takes time, iostat goes wild, but it still works. We used to run on P3 450. That was really wild How to describe hits? I'll just give you something else. Access statistics for gallery.psilon.org on 09.01.2004 |
|
|
italjet
Joined: 2003-03-12
Posts: 12 |
Posted: Sat, 2004-01-10 12:19
|
|
joyoflinux wrote:
If you ported Gallery 1.x to SQL, you definately wasted your time. That's one of the main reasons we are writing G2, not to mention that would be a LARGE pain to write G1 to use SQL. Look man. You guys made a gallery that is simply the best. I like using it and I don't bitch about some problems, not just because it's free but because I have a lot of respect for people like you. People who wrote something and are trying to make it even better, spending their free time on something that matters not just for their own ass. I could go on... But that doesn't mean that others are wasting time trying to do something that would decrease the load. G2 is nice, but it's not even in alpha stage, so what can we do? Stop using gallery? Shut down our servers untill G2 is done? Come on... Luka |
|
|
valiant
Joined: 2003-01-04
Posts: 32509 |
Posted: Sat, 2004-01-10 14:20
|
|
my peak: then i removed lots of pics :/ |
|
|
alindeman
Joined: 2002-10-06
Posts: 8194 |
Posted: Sat, 2004-01-10 14:56
|
|
italjet, I partially see what you're saying, but if you ever really take a look at how G1 works, porting it to use SQL would be such a pain for such a little reward in the future (G2). I'm not saying that they CAN'T do that -- it's their time, but I'm sure that if they really want to contribute to the Gallery project, that there are more productive jobs we can have them help with. Not to mention, if Bharat had someone who had enough time and skills to dedicate as to port G1 to SQL working on G2, he'd get it done many fold faster! |
|
|
8miles
Joined: 2003-04-02
Posts: 24 |
Posted: Sat, 2004-01-10 16:53
|
|
I just do what I need for my own project, so I don't think my time is wasted. Actually I've try to study the source code of G2, and believe it or not, I like G1 more! I like the concept of using php serialized object for individual albums. I believe that loading dat(s) into memory is much faster than query results from several heavily joined tables contains HUGE amount of records. Of coz, SQL can help in some cases. So for some operations serialized object sicks, I use SQL. For operations serialized object is faster, I use serialized object. At least, my site is now hosting 600k+ photos without any performance problem. Most pages generated < 0.5 seconds with Zend engine. Anyway, Gallery is a very great product, my site can't live w/o it, thanks! |
|
|
diomark
Joined: 2003-03-14
Posts: 90 |
Posted: Tue, 2004-01-13 07:58
|
|
Update - 14826 images on a dedicated server, running (a very performance optimized version of) gallery 1.4.1. diomark wrote:
5300+ images on http://mvgals.net - most highrez.. Running off a laptop over my dsl |
|
|
jmullan
Joined: 2002-07-28
Posts: 974 |
Posted: Wed, 2004-01-14 17:08
|
|
7 top-level albums (437 total), 26889 images |
|
|
kimd
Joined: 2003-05-27
Posts: 4 |
Posted: Thu, 2004-03-11 11:54
|
|
5 top-level albums (57 total), 1737 images ^^ |
|
|
LoneShadow
Joined: 2003-11-03
Posts: 18 |
Posted: Thu, 2004-03-11 21:30
|
|
8miles wrote:
I just do what I need for my own project, so I don't think my time is wasted. Its easy for one to expect that you could help with G2 with your experience. But then again, there are other factors in life too. One would have his own priorities to worry about. But hey 8Mile, I am sure lot of people will be happy with some help from you. Just my 2 cents, |
|
|
diomark
Joined: 2003-03-14
Posts: 90 |
Posted: Thu, 2004-06-17 01:21
|
|
Bringing this thread back from the dead.. UPDATE - June 16, 2004 - -mark |
|
|
diomark
Joined: 2003-03-14
Posts: 90 |
Posted: Thu, 2004-06-17 01:23
|
|
ack - just read my old post and realized I had doubled in the past 6 months.. |
|
|
StephaneT
Joined: 2004-07-24
Posts: 26 |
Posted: Sat, 2004-07-24 17:50
|
|
Arround 2 000 pictures, but still growing ! |
|
|
demontech
Joined: 2004-07-30
Posts: 14 |
Posted: Sat, 2004-08-07 23:33
|
|
Well, i have 16 top-level albums (17 total), 815 images on 4 pages |
|
|
partyvibe
Joined: 2003-09-24
Posts: 92 |
Posted: Sun, 2004-09-12 21:02
|
|
385 albums and 15625 images... Nice work to owners of the galleries with links posted in this thread! hugh |
|
|
kit
Joined: 2003-05-21
Posts: 62 |
Posted: Mon, 2004-09-13 19:24
|
|
4 top-level albums (39 total), 1045 images |
|
|
daoist
Joined: 2002-08-22
Posts: 38 |
Posted: Tue, 2004-09-28 18:35
|
|
Picdump! |
|
|
Vidman
Joined: 2002-07-20
Posts: 38 |
Posted: Sat, 2004-10-02 10:16
|
|
^^ jebuz!! 39 top-level albums (196 total), 3834 images I can't wait or the next release ... user quota feature is apparently part of the package!! |
|
|
sid007
Joined: 2004-10-21
Posts: 24 |
Posted: Thu, 2004-10-21 07:56
|
|
Still trying to get my gallery up If any one can help than PM or write to my post in the install thread. |
|
|
volksport
Joined: 2002-10-06
Posts: 239 |
Posted: Sun, 2004-10-31 00:09
|
|
i just hit 40k images/movies |
|
|
tmothy
Joined: 2004-03-06
Posts: 53 |
Posted: Thu, 2004-12-02 03:40
|
|
9 top-level albums (127 total), 3162 images 9 top-level albums (127 total), 3162 images |
|
|
RacerXRed
Joined: 2003-11-09
Posts: 38 |
Posted: Sun, 2004-12-26 04:13
|
|
52 top-level albums (231 total), 24878 images on 9 pages I need a faster Gallery! |
|
|
zztype
Joined: 2004-12-27
Posts: 5 |
Posted: Mon, 2004-12-27 19:13
|
|
142 top-level albums (1086 total), 26203 images on 29 pages http://kapalama.ksbe.edu/photogallery G5 2.0 gHz Dual, 1gb RAM |
|
|
someday23
Joined: 2005-01-29
Posts: 8 |
Posted: Sun, 2005-01-30 01:35
|
|
8miles wrote:
at this moment ...... 32500 albums, 458000 photos ..... Wow! What sort of photos? |
|
|
diomark
Joined: 2003-03-14
Posts: 90 |
Posted: Sun, 2005-01-30 04:52
|
|
11 top-level albums (1150 total), 59529 pictures |
|
|
itsnotlevel
Joined: 2005-09-28
Posts: 25 |
Posted: Fri, 2006-12-01 18:01
|
|
I had a request from a customer to get.... top level albums and # of images, that shows up in the breadcrumb bar of g1....to show up possibly on the top area of g2 just so people can see how many and whats there. Anyone gettin what im talkin about? If so, how would I put that up there? Paul Wilson |
|
|
cush
Joined: 2006-09-19
Posts: 15 |
Posted: Wed, 2007-08-01 20:33
|
|
having lots of thousands of pictures on a gallery first of all will sum up to a huge amount of disk space if you don't simply store lower quality pics. guys like 8miles have to consume huge amounts of bandwith. -- |
|
