problem adding watermark in gallery 1.6

BEMS

Joined: 2009-10-13
Posts: 14
Posted: Tue, 2009-10-13 11:56

Hello BEMS,

please open your own thread.

Also please enable debug mode and post the output thats created when adding the watermark.

Ah, i strongly assume you use Gallery 1.x, right?

Jens
--
Gallery Developer

Hello Jens!

I use Gallery 1.6.-RC3.
Trying to watermark one single picture, I can see a prefect watermark in my preview.
Adding the watermark, this is the debug-output I've received:
Debug messages:

composite: no encode delegate for this image format `/home/sites/blattmann.com/public_html/online_archiv/albums/frauen_u_18/DSC_5497.jpg.tmp'.

Status: 1 (expected 0)
util.php::181 -> Executing: '/home/sites/blattmann.com/public_html/bin/jhead' -te /home/sites/blattmann.com/public_html/online_archiv/albums/frauen_u_18/DSC_5497.jpg /home/sites/blattmann.com/public_html/online_archiv/albums/frauen_u_18/DSC_5497.jpg.tmp

Results:

none

Debug messages:

Error : No such file
in file '/home/sites/blattmann.com/public_html/online_archiv/albums/frauen_u_18/DSC_5497.jpg.tmp'

Do you need any additional information?
 
Tim_j
Tim_j's picture

Joined: 2002-08-15
Posts: 6818
Posted: Tue, 2009-10-13 12:20

yay, a 1.6 tester :-)

Thanks for the output. Please go to the Configuration Wizard, Step 1.
There is a link to the diagnostic page and there a link to the ImageMagick Test.

Which Version is reported?

P.S.: You should consider Gallery 3.0 for a professional page.

Jens
--
Jallery Developer
 
BEMS

Joined: 2009-10-13
Posts: 14
Posted: Tue, 2009-10-13 12:35

This is correct ;)
This is the report I've received:

Checking: '/usr/bin/identify'
Expected status: 0, but actually received status 1.
Checking: '/usr/bin/convert'
Expected status: 0, but actually received status 1.
Checking: '/usr/bin/composite'
OK! Version: ImageMagick 6.4.3 2008-08-28 Q16

It looks like there are some components missing!? How can I fix that?

I've considered Gallery 2.0 for a professional page. But my provider's server didn't like that because of the php-processes which needed all of its resources and broke down twice... ;)
So I've "downgraded" to 1.6..
 
Tim_j
Tim_j's picture

Joined: 2002-08-15
Posts: 6818
Posted: Tue, 2009-10-13 13:02

You know that Gallery 1.6 will never be released? Gallery 1.x is End-of-Life

About your ImageMagick issue ... For this you have to contact your hoster.
No idea why it does not work.

Jens
--
Jallery Developer
 
BEMS

Joined: 2009-10-13
Posts: 14
Posted: Tue, 2009-10-13 13:12

Thanks for your informations.
No, I didn't know that.
So I should make another "downgrade" to 1.5x? What do you suggest?

If I understand you right, the whole issue about watermarks has something to do with missing parts of ImageMagick?
Thanks anyway!
 
Tim_j
Tim_j's picture

Joined: 2002-08-15
Posts: 6818
Posted: Tue, 2009-10-13 13:30

Well,

If you want Gallery 1.x "technology", then you could move over to Jallery :-D
But its still unstable.

I suggest to go for Gallery 3.0

Yes, your understanding is right.

Jens
--
Jallery Developer
 
BEMS

Joined: 2009-10-13
Posts: 14
Posted: Tue, 2009-10-13 13:42

Thanks for helping!
I will try Gallery3, but I assume that my provider's server will have a problem as well, as I had it with Gallery2..
Best regards from good old Switzerland
Chris
 
Tim_j
Tim_j's picture

Joined: 2002-08-15
Posts: 6818
Posted: Tue, 2009-10-13 13:51

Waving over from Zurich ;-)
 
BEMS

Joined: 2009-10-13
Posts: 14
Posted: Wed, 2009-10-14 07:59

Gallery 3 works fine and also my provider's server has nothing to complain ;)
Thanks a lot and best regards from Meilen to Zurich.. ;)